Police should be prohibited from using general facial recognition surveillance to identify people not suspected of crimes. Certain private databases of faces for identification systems should also be banned.
This is the sentiment of the majority of Members of the European Parliament this week. In a vote Wednesday, 377 deputies supported a resolution restricting the use of facial recognition by law enforcement officials, 248 voted against and 62 abstained.
“AI-based identification systems already misidentify ethnic minority groups, LGBTI people, the elderly and women at higher rates, which is of particular concern in the context of law enforcement. and justice “, one reads in a press release of the parliament.
“To guarantee respect for fundamental rights when using these technologies, algorithms must be transparent, traceable and sufficiently documented,” ask MEPs. Whenever possible, public authorities should use open source software in order to be more transparent. “
On top of that, most representatives believe that facial recognition technology should not be used by police in automatic mass surveillance of people in public, and surveillance should be limited to those who have broken the law. Data sets collected by private companies, such as Clearview AI, to identify citizens should also be banned, along with systems that allow cops to predict crimes based on people’s behavior and backgrounds. This is precisely what parliament said:
It has also been approved for ranking people with social scores, assigned by their personality, behavior, and everything else you’ve got.
“Fundamental rights are unconditional,” said Peter Vitanov, MEP representing the Bulgarian Socialist Party. “For the first time, we are calling for a moratorium on the deployment of facial recognition systems for law enforcement purposes, as the technology has proven ineffective and often leads to discriminatory results.
“We are clearly opposed to predictive policing based on the use of AI as well as any processing of biometric data leading to mass surveillance. It is a huge victory for all European citizens.
Voting is non-binding, which means that it cannot directly lead to legislative change. Instead, it was launched to reveal whether members might be in favor of upcoming bills like the AI Law, said a spokesperson for the European Parliament The register.
“The resolution is a non-exhaustive list of uses of AI that MEPs in the home affairs field find problematic. They are calling for a moratorium on the deployment of new facial recognition systems for law enforcement and a ban on the narrower category of private facial recognition databases, ”the spokesperson added.
He also called for border control systems to also stop using biometric data to track travelers across the EU. ®
A Black Uber driver in the UK, who lost his job after being banned from the rideshare app when his facial recognition system failed to identify him, takes legal action against the car giant technology. It will be supported by the Independent Workers’ Union of Great Britain (IWGB).
It is alleged that people of color are five times more likely to be misidentified by Uber’s facial recognition authentication mechanism. The union called for a 24-hour boycott of Uber to encourage ridesharing companies to change their ways.
“Uber’s continued use of an ineffective facial recognition algorithm on people of color is discriminatory” noted Henry Chango Lopez, IWGB General Secretary, Tuesday.